Armando Puno a member of the Bar with gross immorality and misconduct. DISBARMENT OF ARMANDO PUNO.


2d Legal Ethics Digest Complete Id 5c112dd80e235

R E S O L U T I O N.

Quingwa vs puno digest. Academiaedu - Share research. Share Ethics-quingwa vs Puno. Puno - Case Digestpdf from POLITICAL 110 at Western Leyte College of Ormoc city Inc.

Complainant is an educated woman having been a public school teacher for a number of years. Flora Quingwa filed a verified complaint charging Armando Puno a member of the Bar with gross immorality and misconduct. Respondent were engaged to be married.

One time the respondent invited the complainant to watch a movie but later they went to a. DISBARMENT OF ARMANDO PUNO FLORA QUINGWA VS. Armando Puno a member of the Bar with gross immorality and misconduct.

ARMANDO PUNO Adm Case No. 389 January 31 1972. 389 February 28 1967 Atty.

On April 16 1959 Flora Quingwa filed before this Court a verified complaint charging Armando Puno a member of the Bar with gross immorality and misconduct. FLORA QUINGWA Complainant vs. 389 February 28 1967.

This site is like the Google for academics science and research. FLORA QUINGWA complainant vs. Complainant and respondent were engaged to be married.

Respondent Armando Puno of Zamboanga City in Administrative Case No. In his answer the respondent denied all the material allegations of the complaint and as a special defense averred that the allegations therein do not constitute grounds for disbarment or suspension under section 25. Complainant Flora Quingwa filed before the Supreme Court a verified complaint charging respondent Atty.

Chanrobles virtual law library. DISBARMENT OF ARMANDO PUNO. PUNO 19 SCRA 439 AC.

Flora Quingwa filed a complaint. Armando Puno for and in his own behalf as appellee. 389 FEBRUARY 28 1967 FACTS.

Case digest by Bernice De Guzman. 389- February 28 1967 Penned by Justice Regala. On April 16 1959 Flora Quingwa filed before this Court a verified complaint charging Armando Puno a member of the Bar with gross immorality and misconduct.

As prayed for respondent Armando Puno is ordered reinstated in the practice of the law as a member of the Philippine Bar subject to the conditions that 1 he shall formally acknowledge his child Armando Puno Jr now in the care of the mother complainant Flora Quingwa and 2 the said petitioner will provide a minimum amount of P12500. One time the respondent invited the complainant to watch a. 389 petitions for the lifting of the disbarment decree issued against him by this Court in its decision of 28 February.


Beneficios De La Pina Pineapple Nutrition Pineapple Health Benefits Pineapple Benefits


146810941 Legal Ethics Case Digest 1 20 Docx